----------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
CT scans are used for specific reasons related to problems within the head, which have been useful in the past. These could be anything from bone trauma to instances where brain tumor research should come into play. It seems like these scans are immensely helpful, though it seems like this is becoming an action that is less recommended. The reason for this is that there's a possibility that, in large doses, the scans could be the triggers which are able to form cancer within the brain.
An article on TVNZ said that, according to recent brain tumor research findings, those who receive CT scans before the age of 20 increase their risk of cancer. This was discovered by a team of researchers within the Melbourne University School of Population and Global Health. The group was headed by Professor John Matthews, who said that these should be limited. Considering the symptoms which are cited by organizations like Voices Against Brain Cancer, I don't think that anyone is going to be confused as to why this is.
It seems like these scans have changed, though, as lower amounts of radiation are likely now than they were between 1985 and 2005. However, it seems like cases of cancer can still arise, as was shown by a report on bmj.com. It seems like researchers expected a lower increase. Nonetheless, the study said that younger people who went about these scans were 24 percent more likely to contract the condition as opposed to those who didn't take up the procedure, which I find to be pretty telling.
If there was a group of 10,000 young people, it was said that there would be 39 bouts of cancer to occur within the year. However, if CT scans were seen within the group, it's possible that we're looking at 6 more bouts when they shouldn't have been there at all. It may not seem like a high statistic on its own but consider just how much groups can vary. It's entirely possible that the group can be bigger, meaning that the rate of diagnoses can elevate accordingly.
I don't think that anyone can disagree with the notion that cancer is difficult to research. The reason for this is because it's tough to figure out where it might have originated from. It's possible that CT scans could have been the sources, seeing as how these are the ones which have varying amounts of radiation tied in with them. This probably goes without saying but the fewer scans which are seen, the more better actual cancer rates will appear to be.
An article on TVNZ said that, according to recent brain tumor research findings, those who receive CT scans before the age of 20 increase their risk of cancer. This was discovered by a team of researchers within the Melbourne University School of Population and Global Health. The group was headed by Professor John Matthews, who said that these should be limited. Considering the symptoms which are cited by organizations like Voices Against Brain Cancer, I don't think that anyone is going to be confused as to why this is.
It seems like these scans have changed, though, as lower amounts of radiation are likely now than they were between 1985 and 2005. However, it seems like cases of cancer can still arise, as was shown by a report on bmj.com. It seems like researchers expected a lower increase. Nonetheless, the study said that younger people who went about these scans were 24 percent more likely to contract the condition as opposed to those who didn't take up the procedure, which I find to be pretty telling.
If there was a group of 10,000 young people, it was said that there would be 39 bouts of cancer to occur within the year. However, if CT scans were seen within the group, it's possible that we're looking at 6 more bouts when they shouldn't have been there at all. It may not seem like a high statistic on its own but consider just how much groups can vary. It's entirely possible that the group can be bigger, meaning that the rate of diagnoses can elevate accordingly.
I don't think that anyone can disagree with the notion that cancer is difficult to research. The reason for this is because it's tough to figure out where it might have originated from. It's possible that CT scans could have been the sources, seeing as how these are the ones which have varying amounts of radiation tied in with them. This probably goes without saying but the fewer scans which are seen, the more better actual cancer rates will appear to be.
About the Author:
Contact Voices Against Brain Cancer if you are seeking more information about brain cancer research.. Unique version for reprint here: The Tremendous Downsides Of CT Scans In Brain Tumor Research.
0 comments:
Post a Comment